Mindloom · From Theory to Research
If speech is an output of the mind, can we decode it?
Five questions that transform the theory of defensive speech into a research program
Problem Statement
Five Key Questions
Hypotheses
Five Testable Hypotheses
Each question becomes a hypothesis that can be operationalized and tested.
Program Genesis
This is How the Research Program Was Born
architecture of defensive speech and automatic thinking
From five questions and five hypotheses grew Mindloom — a research program that unites the theory of defensive speech, a neurosymbolic classification engine, and products for analyzing contact dynamics.
Theoretical FoundationInformation-speech model of reality, 13 Mindloom nodes, 13-level defensive speech schema, cascade from need to paradigm
Taxonomy10 speech modes (BUILD, SEEK, UNSEAL, LOCK, SEAL, DRAIN, FLOOD, EDGE, SHIFT, VOID), 171 speech forms, 5 behavioral vectors (SEEK, PUSH, PULL, DRIFT, BLOCK)
MetricD-Index — defensive speech index: frequency profile of speech modes showing dominant cognitive routes of a specific person
EngineMindloom Engine — neurosymbolic speech classification system: LLM-primary architecture with deterministic guard-rails for reproducibility
ValidationAnnotated bilingual corpus (RU/EN), inter-annotator agreement, predictive validity, convergent validity with clinical instruments
ProductsConversation Shield (contact dynamics analysis), MasterMind Analyzer (group conversations), Dating Shield (romantic patterns)
Horizon
Questions This Program Opens
Behind research hypotheses lie questions of a different scale — about the nature of thinking, contact, and the human world itself.
QUESTION → HYPOTHESIS → TAXONOMY → ENGINE → VALIDATION → PRODUCT
READ NEXT
MINDLOOM COGNITIVE ARCHITECTURE LAB · 2026